Pension gains for Ford, GM free up cash for core business

Pension gains for Ford, GM free up cash for core business
Mon, Jul 29


While drawing car buyers and praise from the likes of Consumer Reports, General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. are getting a grip on pensions that will free up cash to develop future hits.
GM and Ford, burdened by some of the largest pension obligations among all U.S. companies, said last week they see significant improvement in their plans because of rising interest rates used to calculate the cost of future payments to retirees. When rates rise, the cost today of those promises declines. So pension shortfalls that were many years in the making can shrink without ever-larger payments by the companies.
Over the long term, this should allow more spending on the core business and less on retirees. That in turn creates a brighter outlook for the companies, which are already delivering more competitive cars like the Chevrolet Impala and Ford Fusion, and better-than-estimated profits.
“It’s one less thing investors have to worry about on the risk side,” said Michael Razewski, a New York-based principal at Douglas C. Lane & Associates, which oversees $3.1 billion, including Ford shares. “The less Ford has to focus on funding the pension, the more they can focus on driving innovative products and services and meeting customer demand.”
Confounding challenge
GM and Ford have shelled out heavily for years to try to shore up their pensions, one of their most confounding challenges. Ford plans to make $5 billion in cash pension contributions this year, on top of $3.4 billion last year and $1.1 billion in 2011. This year’s payments are just shy of the $5.5 billion that Ford devoted to capital spending last year on everything from building factories to developing future cars and trucks.
“We won’t have to allocate as much capital to pensions as we have the last couple of years and certainly this year,” Bob Shanks, chief financial

officer of Dearborn, Mich.-based Ford, said during a July 24 conference call with analysts and reporters. “That will give us the ability to take the cash that we’re generating and invest it in other parts of the business that can support further growth.”
Ford’s pension plans were underfunded by $18.7 billion last year. Only Detroit-based GM, with a shortfall of $27.8 billion, General Electric Co. and Boeing Co. had bigger holes at the end of 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
“We’ve made good progress since the end of last year from a pension-funded position perspective, given the rise in interest rates that’s clearly helped our overall funding position,” GM CFO Dan Ammann told reporters recently. On a conference call with analysts, he said the stronger fund “gives us more rather than less flexibility.”
$900 million
GM isn’t required to make any contributions to its U.S. plans this year, according to last year’s annual report. The company said it expects to pay in about $900 million anyway.
Both automakers have taken big steps to contain their pension costs for salaried workers. A year ago, GM said it would spend as much as $4.5 billion to shift salaried retirees to a group annuity handled by a unit of Prudential Financial Inc. The annuity, and lump-sum buyout offers to 42,000 retirees, was forecast by GM to shave $26 billion from its pension load.
Ford is also offering lump-sum buyouts to salaried retirees. The automaker has said it wants to eliminate remaining shortfalls in its pension funds by mid-decade.
Fed actions
For several years, GM and Ford could blame Treasury yields, a benchmark in their pension calculation, for at least part of their shortfalls. Yields plunged after the 2008 financial crisis as the Federal Reserve embarked on unprecedented bond-purchase programs to lower borrowing costs and encourage spending.
Interest rates have risen the last two months after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank may reduce its asset purchases this year and stop in the middle of 2014 if economic growth meets policy makers’ projections.
The increase in rates will help reduce the funding needs at all types of pensions, whether run by corporations or governments. Detroit, long dubbed the Motor City, this month filed the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history and is struggling under a large unfunded pension obligation that could lead to benefit cuts for 30,000 current and former city workers. Though shortfalls can develop in the private sector, companies have stricter funding requirements than governments and pay into a federal insurance fund.
“If the year ended today, this would be the best year for funded status in the 13-year history of the Milliman Pension Funding Index,” said John Ehrhardt, a New York-based principal and consulting actuary for Milliman Inc., which tracks corporate pension performance.
For GM, each increase of 1 percentage point in the discount rate cuts $8.76 billion from the present value of its U.S. pension obligation, according to its 2012 annual report. A similar increase would reduce Ford’s U.S. total obligation by $5.2 billion, its regulatory filing shows.
Ford has seen a 70 to 80 basis-point rise in U.S. discount rates this year, Shanks said this week. An increase at the top of that range would narrow Ford’s pension gap by 42 percent to $10.8 billion by the end of this year, Matthew Stover, an auto analyst with Guggenheim Securities, wrote in a report yesterday.
By 2015, GM may reduce its pension shortfall by 24 percent to $21 billion, Ryan Brinkman, a New York-based auto analyst for JPMorgan Chase & Co., estimated in a July 15 report.
Pension health
The current value of promised future payments is only part of the total pension equation. The investment

return is also important in assessing a plan’s health. GM and Ford have said they were trying to take some of the risk out of their plans by moving to a greater mix of fixed-income assets.
It’s unclear whether higher rates might damp the returns on Ford’s and GM’s investments

, said Brian Johnson, a Chicago-based auto analyst for Barclays Plc.
“It depends on the extent to which they might reduce some of these long-dated bond holdings we believe they built up over the last couple years, which served them well when rates were falling,” he said in a telephone interview.

Seniority Lists
Bargaining Committee

Mike Herron
Tim Stannard
Zone at Large – 1st
Danny Taylor
Zone at Large – 2nd
Mark Wilkerson
Joe McClure
Chad Poynor
Steve Roberts
Derek Lewis
Bill Cundiff
Kirk Zebbs
Don Numinen
Jay Minella
Danny Bragg
Chris Hill
Rashad Thomas
Keith Oswald
Chris Brown

1853 Officers

Tim Stannard
Mike Herron
Vice President
Darrell DeJean
Financial Secretary
Mark Wunderlin
Recording Secretary
Peggy Mullins
Trustee (3)
Jay Lowe
Dave Clements
Dave Spare
Sgt. at Arms
David C Spare
Ashley Holloway
E-Board at Large (2)
David Ryder
Steve Roberts

GM Unit Chair
Mike Herron
Leadec Unit Chair
Larry Poole
Ryder Unit Chair
Patrick Linck
AFV Unit Chair
Katherine McGaw
Retiree Chair
Mike Martinez