Email List Sign Up

GM-Chrysler bailout: $14,705 per new vehicle

GM-Chrysler bailout: $14,705 per new vehicle

 

 

 
 
 

In the bizarre new world created by Ottawa and Washington D. C., healthy companies–hello Ford, Toyota and other non-troubled automakers and their employees–are punished due to General Motors and Chrysler; the latter gave away the farm on pay, pensions and health benefits and apparently have employees and retirees who expect others to pay for such profligacy, this as if there exists a right to the paycheques of others.

In the real world, only 38 per cent of Canadians have a company or union pension; many of those, and also the 62 per cent who must provide for their own retirements, will also now pay for GM and Chrysler pensions.

In the upside-down world created by U.S. President Barack Obama’s tight links to U. S. labour, those who lent GM and Chrysler money in good faith–not just those in blue suits but the money they manage which belongs to retired teachers and other folks–are told their legal rights should be forgone; they are told their interests must come third(and for pennies on the dollar) after governments that send good public money after bad managers, and after autoworkers’ unions who helped sink GM and Chrysler in the first place.

In the economic world created by both Democrats in D. C., and by Conservative MPs from southern Ontario who plumped for "aid" to the auto industry, a federal deficit estimated at "only" $35 billion in late January will now end up at closer to $50 billion.

If, as is now estimated, the total bailout to GM and Chrysler reaches $13 billion from the federal and Ontario governments alone (excluding the Americans), the math becomes simple: most of the additional federal deficit this year is directly attributable to the auto bailout and thus to southern Ontario MPs.

In the consumer world now bent out of all recognition by government fiat, consumers who recently bought a Ford, Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Volkswagen or some other automobile may have assumed their purchase was their only contribution to an automaker’s bottom line.

Not quite. Here’s a figure to consider: According to auto industry analyst Dennis DesRosiers, automobile sales in Canada in the first four months this year totalled 428,500. Subtract the vehicles sold by GM and Chrysler, and 294,675 automobiles were sold by other automakers between January and April.

Assume that automobile sales and market share will remain constant for the next eight months. Thus, almost 1.3 million automobiles will be sold in 2009 with just over 884,025 moved off the lot by everyone except Chrysler and GM.

Now suppose that instead of billing the public treasuries of Ottawa and Ontario $13 billion for a GM-Chrysler bailout, every consumer who purchases a new automobile in 2009 was billed directly for their "share" of the bailout.

In other words, suppose governments, in a rare moment of taxation honesty, added a "GM-Chrysler bailout tax" to every automobile customer’s invoice. This year, a $13-billion bailout billed to non-Chrysler-GM purchases, i. e., to just over 884,000 new auto-mobiles, means each buyer would each face an additional auto tax of $14,705 (and 47 cents, for those who like to be precise).

In a recent interview, a reporter half-objected to my standard reply on corporate welfare: it is lousy policy, unfair to competitors and their employees, costly to taxpayers, and as such is as dumb as the proverbial sack of hammers.

"Yes" he replied, "but given the reality of politics, what options would you suggest?" His question assumed a lot, not least of which is that politicians have no control over policy.

Politicians can’t control the weather and many other events in and outside of politics; they can decide whether to spend public cash, the equivalent of $14,700-plus for every new, non-GM/Chrysler vehicle sold in 2009.

Because of an inability to say no to another bailout, the political class in Ottawa, to say nothing of the worse problem in Washington, have indeed created that $14,705 reality. It is the rest of us who will pay for it.

Mark Milke is the research director for the frontier centre ( www.fcpp.org).his coluMn appears every sUnday.

Share
Seniority Lists
Recent Posts!
Bargaining Committee

Chairman
Mike Herron
President
Tim Stannard
Zone at Large – 1st
Danny Taylor
Zone at Large – 2nd
Mark Wilkerson
Committeepersons
Joe McClure
Chad Poynor
Steve Roberts
Derek Lewis
Bill Cundiff
Kirk Zebbs
Don Numinen
Jay Minella
Danny Bragg
Chris Hill
Rashad Thomas
Keith Oswald
Chris Brown

1853 Officers

President
Tim Stannard
Chairman
Mike Herron
Vice President
Darrell DeJean
Financial Secretary
Mark Wunderlin
Recording Secretary
Peggy Mullins
Trustee (3)
Jay Lowe
Dave Clements
Dave Spare
Sgt. at Arms
David C Spare
Guide
Ashley Holloway
E-Board at Large (2)
David Ryder
Steve Roberts
GM Unit Chair
Mike Herron
Voith Unit Chair
Larry Poole
Ryder Unit Chair
Patrick Linck
AFV Unit Chair
Neil Osborne
Retiree Chair
Mike Martinez

Get Text Alerts



asdasdsd

*Standard text messaging rates may apply from your carrier